Israel approves Gaza City occupation as Netanyahu defies critics, warns of Hamas “neo-Nazi’ tactics

• Netanyahu announces Israeli military control of Gaza, with plans to eventually transfer governance to unspecified Arab forces.
• The plan includes occupying Gaza City, disarming Hamas, demilitarizing Gaza, and maintaining Israeli security control, drawing sharp international criticism.
• Palestinian leaders and global officials condemn the move as ethnic cleansing and a violation of international law, warning of catastrophic humanitarian consequences.
• Israeli opposition grows, with military leaders and politicians worried about prolonged conflict, troop exhaustion, and diplomatic isolation amid protests for a ceasefire.
• Gaza’s humanitarian crisis worsens, with record child malnutrition and mass displacement as aid remains severely restricted, raising fears of further devastation.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has brazenly announced plans for Israel to assume full military control of Gaza on the pretense of dismantling Hamas and establishing a post-war security framework before transferring governance to unspecified “Arab forces.”

Speaking exclusively to Fox News, Netanyahu framed the strategy as necessary for Israel’s security and the liberation of Palestinians from Hamas’s rule, but it undoubtedly risks escalating regional tensions and worsening Gaza’s humanitarian crisis. With Israel already controlling 75% of the territory, Netanyahu’s rhetoric, which included labeling Hamas a “neo-Nazi army”, has drawn sharp international scrutiny as the conflict enters a volatile new phase.

Netanyahu wants the world to believe it’s a security perimeter and not long-term occupation

Netanyahu insisted Israel has no intention of governing Gaza indefinitely.  Instead, he claims they want to establish a security buffer to prevent future attacks. “We intend to… in order to assure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza, and to pass it to civilian governance,” he told Fox News’ Bill Hemmer. He emphasized that Israel would eventually hand administration to “Arab forces that will govern it properly without threatening us and giving Gazans a good life.”

The Israeli Security Cabinet has since approved Netanyahu’s plan to occupy Gaza City, marking a significant escalation. A statement from Netanyahu’s office outlined five key principles for ending the war: disarming Hamas, returning all hostages (living and deceased), demilitarizing Gaza, maintaining Israeli security control, and establishing a new civil administration excluding Hamas and the Palestinian Authority.

Global unease and domestic dissent are both growing

Not surprisingly, Netanyahu’s plan has been met with fierce backlash. Palestinian leaders, including Mustafa Barghouti of the Palestinian National Initiative, condemned the move as “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide.” Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong warned that forced displacement violates international law, while former Middle East negotiator Aaron David Miller called the strategy “fantastical” and warned of catastrophic humanitarian consequences.

Even within Israel, opposition is mounting. Military Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir reportedly cautioned against a full occupation, citing risks to hostages and troop exhaustion. Opposition leader Yair Lapid blasted the decision as a “disaster,” arguing it would prolong the war, endanger hostages, and isolate Israel diplomatically. Protests erupted in Jerusalem as families of hostages demanded a ceasefire, fearing expanded operations would sentence their loved ones to death.

The humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza shows no signs of slowing down

As Netanyahu pushes forward, Gaza’s civilian population faces unprecedented suffering. The UN reported a record 11,877 children under five acutely malnourished in July, with only a trickle of aid reaching the enclave. Displaced Palestinians like Mahmoud al-Qurashli told Reuters, “Practically all of Gaza has been squeezed into the western part of Gaza City. At this point, there’s no difference anymore—whether he occupies it or not.”

International aid groups warn that further military action will exacerbate starvation and displacement. The Norwegian Refugee Council’s Shaina Low described conditions as “the worst we’ve ever seen,” while UNICEF stressed that without urgent access, malnutrition will claim more young lives.

There is no question that the situation in the Middle East is absolutely untenable, but Netanyahu’s strategy could well come with a staggering human cost. Although he insists the goal is security and stability, it will bring with it military overextension, global condemnation, and the specter of endless insurgency.

Sources for this article include:

YourNews.com

FoxNews.com

CNN.com